Via Gemma King, The Canadian High Commission has invited ANU members who might be interested to a free screening of Maker of Monsters: The Extraordinary Life of Beau Dick. It’s happening at the Palace Electric on the evening of March 7. Details and bookings here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/maker-of-monsters-the-extraordinary-life-of-beau-dick-tickets-42411141867
The famous Thursday Lunchtime Seminars are back in 2018. They run from 1-2pm every Thursday during teaching weeks (19 Feb-15 March and 16 April-25 May). Speakers are invited to present work in progress, rather than finished material, for collegial but robust questioning, feedback, suggestions and discussion. Presentations are welcome from any area of literary and cultural studies, including gender studies, film and popular culture.
To book your spot, please send an email to email@example.com with the proposed title of your paper, along with two or three preferred presentation dates. I plan to finalise the program by the end of January. Act now to avoid disappointment! Please also pass this invitation on to colleagues at other institutions, visiting scholars, and especially graduate students.
12-15 September 2018
The Australian National University, and National Film and Sound Archive, Canberra
Nearly two centuries after its anonymous publication on 1 January 1818, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus remains as topical as ever. Its core story—of a recklessly ambitious and naïve scientist whose artificial human-like creature arouses only horror and disgust, and escapes control to seek revenge on his creator—has become, for better or worse, the techno-scientific fable of modernity. First adapted for stage by Richard Brinsley Peake in 1823, and for film by Edison Studios in 1910, the story has inspired more theatre, film, television and other adaptations than any other modern narrative, with more than 50 screen adaptations appearing in the 2010s alone. From Fritz Lang’s Metropolis to Alex Garland’s Ex Machina, and The Rocky Horror Picture Show to The Addams Family, the Frankenstein myth reaches into every recess of high and popular culture.
We invite proposals for 20-minute papers or 3 x 20-minute panel sessions from scholars across the humanities, sciences and social sciences that respond in interdisciplinary ways to this most interdisciplinary of novels, including, but not limited to:
- Literary studies, especially of the long eighteenth century, Romanticism, Victorian and neo-Victorian literature
- Re-tellings and re-imaginings of the Frankenstein story in various modes and genres, e.g. SF, steampunk, speculative fiction, slash fiction, etc.
- Film, television, theatre and performance, and visual studies
- Digital humanities, reception studies, histories of popular culture and media ecologies
- Gender studies, queer theory and the history of sexuality
- Disability studies and posthumanism
- The history of medicine, especially reproductive technologies
- Science and technology studies; images and imaginaries of science and scientists
- The history and philosophy of biology, especially in relation to vitalism
- Ecocriticism and the Anthropocene
- Affect theory and the history of emotions
- Frankenstein and race, colonialism, empire
- Global and local Frankensteins, e.g. Australian Frankensteins
- Frankenstein and material history
- Cyborgs, robots, artificial intelligence and machine learning
- Synthetic biology, genetic engineering and artificial life
To maintain order among this menagerie of monsters, we propose the following four overarching themes, each of which will be addressed by one of our keynote speakers:
Frankenstein in 1818: historicising the monster
(Professor Sharon Ruston, Lancaster)
Frankenstein as scientific fable: from grave-robbing and galvanism to synthetic biology and machine learning
(Professor Genevieve Bell, Australian National University)
Adaptation and experimentation: Frankenstein in film and other media
(Assistant Professor Shane Denson, Stanford)
Frankenstein’s queer family: gender, sexuality, reproduction and the work of care
(Professor Julie Carlson, University of California, Santa Barbara)
Please send proposals for papers or sessions—including a title, 250-word abstract, and brief author biography—to Dr Russell Smith at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The deadline for proposals is 23 February 2018. Proposals will be reviewed by a committee comprising scholars from the humanities, sciences and social sciences, and we will endeavour to inform applicants of the outcome within two weeks of the submission deadline. Please note that we will endeavour to notify overseas applicants earlier if they submit proposals before the submission deadline.
For further information and updates, as well as information about the Humanities Research Centre’s annual theme for 2018, Imagining Science and Technology 200 Years after Frankenstein, see: http://hrc.anu.edu.au/2018-annual-theme. Please direct any inquiries to Penny Brew at email@example.com.
CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST: SESSIONAL TEACHING IN ENGLISH, 2018
The English Program will maintain a register of tutors interested in contributing to part-time teaching in undergraduate courses, commencing in 2018.
If you are interested in tutoring, please email a cv and a short cover letter indicating courses you would be interested in tutoring in semesters 1 and 2, 2018. First year courses are most likely to require tutors. Please indicate your stage of candidature and whether you have had any tutoring experience to date.
Deadline: Friday December 15, 2017.
Please send material to the English convenor, Lucy Neave: firstname.lastname@example.org
We may not be able inform you about tutoring opportunities until February, 2018.
The Hero of His Own Life?: Biofiction, Legacy, and Charles Dickens’s Life-Writing Novels
Monday 11 December, 2pm, Milgate Room, AD Hope Bldg, SLLL
Charles Dickens sought to control the narratives of everyone he encountered, both in life and on the page. He even edited his own identity by burning both his correspondence and an early attempt at autobiography. Dickens’s reputation has now become public domain, however, and neo-Victorian authors are re-imagining the Dickensian. Scholarship has previously examined Dickens’s notorious fusing of fact and fiction, his angst about legacy, and his shifting authorial identity. However, what has not been made explicit is how these concerns manifest in a curious pattern, wherein Dickens’s professed protagonists—the ostensible hero/ine/s of their respective texts—are often deposed, sometimes even by the author himself. I trace this trend through Dickens’s novels exhibiting the tenets of life-writing—which I refer to as his life-writing novels—including David Copperfield’s (fictional) autobiography, the memoirs of Mr. Pickwick and Oliver Twist, and Little Dorrit’s biography. Such a focus privileges Dickens’s most famous protagonists, through whom he asked to be remembered.
Kathryne Ford is currently completing a PhD at the Australian National University; she also has a BA (English Technical and Professional Writing) and an MA (English Literature), both from the University of Memphis. Kathryne has presented at a number of conferences in New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom, and she recently published an article on Neo-Victorian biofiction, memory, and authorial agency in the Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies (2016).
Filling in the ‘blank page’ of literary history: What were women fighting for in WWII Japan through their poetry?
Thursday 26 October, 1pm, Milgate Room, AD Hope Bldg, SLLL
When compared, women’s poetry (as well as women’s writing in general) during the war‐time Japan (1941‐45) seems to be shockingly different before and after WWII. Their strong belief in feminism and modernism seems to have been completely discarded in their propaganda poetry in support of the war and the government’s party line during WWII. Some critics argue that women wrote these propaganda poems because there was no other choice, however, I argue it is not the case. This paper examines what is continued and what seems to be discontinued in women’s poetry written in WWII Japan, and discusses why women poets are hardly ever criticized by male literary scholars for writing propaganda poems in support of war, and the danger of mythologizing women as innocent motherly figures who cannot write brutal bloody poetry for war.
Rina Kikuchi is an Associate Professort at Shiga University Japan. She has an M.A. in comparative literary theory from the University of Warwick, UK, and a Ph.D in contemporary Irish poetry from Chiba University, Japan, for which her study included a year of research at Trinity College, Dublin. At present, she is a visiting fellow at ANU and the University of Canberra, and conducting her research on modern and contemporary Japanese women’s poetry, which includes translating their works into English. Her most recent book is a bilingual anthology, Poet to Poet: Contemporary Women Poets from Japan (Recent Work Press, 2017) coedited with a NZ/Australia poet, Jen Crawford.