Lunchtime seminar: Imogen Mathew on How Anita Heiss Rewrites the Public Intellectual

Anita Heiss Rewrites the Public Intellectual for 21st Century Australia

Thursday 27 July, 1pm Milgate Room, AD Hope Bldg, SLLL

Aboriginal intellectual interventions in contemporary Australia come in many shapes and sizes, from the @IndigenousX twitter account to Stan Grant’s 2015 IQ2 Racism address. My research gives one account of how these interventions play out in the Australian public sphere through an extended case study of Anita Heiss, a Wiradjuri woman from Central NSW. Heiss is an author, academic, activist and—as I argue in my thesis—public intellectual. My thesis is structured around two of Heiss’s most important interventions in the Australian public sphere, her commercial women’s fiction and her role in the 2011 court case Eatock vs Bolt, where Herald Sun journalist Andrew Bolt was found guilty of Racial Discrimination. These interventions may appear to have little in common yet Heiss pursues the same argument in each, that the rich diversity of Aboriginal life and experience far exceeds the limited stereotypes that animate the Australian imagination. My research extends beyond a close reading of the court case and her commercial women’s fiction to incorporate a reception study of Heiss’s interventions. To this end, I examine user-generated reviews of Heiss’s literary output in what Simone Murray calls ‘the digital literary sphere’. The original contribution made by this project is two-fold. On one hand, I present the first sustained academic account of Heiss’ fiction and its reception. On the other, I contribute to ongoing debates about the role of the Public Intellectual, particularly as she is interpreted and constructed in 21st century Australia.

Imogen Mathew is a PhD candidate in SLLL. Her writing has been published in the Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature (JASAL), Contemporary Women’s Writing, Australian Humanities Review and Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies (forthcoming 2017).

Literary giveaway: Gemma King in conversation with Stephanie Smee

A bitter, beautiful & important book. So says Robert Fisk of the rediscovered French sensation, No Place to Lay One’s Head. Originally published in 1945 in Geneva, it tells the story of the flight from Vichy France of Polish Jew Francoise Frenkel. Meet the talented translator of this book, Stephanie Smee, in conversation with ANU’s Dr Gemma King, at Muse Canberra, Sun 25 June, 3-4pm. [http://www.musecanberra.com.au/events/2017/5/15/stephanie-smee-no-place-to-lay-ones-head]

For your chance to win one of two double passes to the event, email contact@musecanberra.com.au with subject line CuPSS_Smee. Note only winners will be notified.

Lindiane Vieira: Dynamics of Placement and Displacement

Dynamics of Placement and Displacement in Doris Pilkington’s Under the Wintamarra Tree. Once a ‘Subaltern’, Always a ‘Subaltern’?

Thursday 8 June, 1pm Milgate Room, AD Hope Bldg, SLLL

Doris Pilkington’s Under the Wintamarra Tree (2002) is a sequel to Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence (1996), in which we are presented with a story in a confessional tone that reveals the adventures of three indigenous girls (including Doris’ mother Molly) who fled the “Native” settlement that they were forcibly taken to. Both narratives are valuable representations of the ‘stolen generations’ in Australia. In Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence we are mostly presented with Molly’s story. In Under the Wintamarra Tree, Doris reveals her own story in which, through acts of resistance and resilience, she appears to embrace her displaced condition in order to come to terms with her own identity and cultural heritage. The dynamics of placement and displacement are here analysed through a postcolonial perspective. The ‘stolen generation’ is the consequence of domineering and imperialistic acts in which “half-caste” or “mixed race” children were strategically taken away from their families in indigenous communities and placed in “Native” settlements where they were trained and educated to be servants to white families. I make use of Gayatri Spivak’s term the “subaltern” in order to reflect upon Doris’s life and how it had to be constantly renegotiated until, through her writings, she divulged her stories to the world. In such a way, her voice can never be silenced, but serves as a representation of the many lives of displaced peoples around the globe who have been manipulated within the prerogatives of ruthless power.

Lindiane Vieira is currently a Research Fellow at SLLL. She has been working on the project Locating the Displaced: The Female Experience of Migration and Displacement in Contemporary Literature.

Invitation: Bloomsday in Canberra

Along with Neville Potter, a PhD graduate of SLLL, Russell Smith has been involved in organizing an event for Bloomsday, the annual celebration in honour of James Joyce’s novel Ulysses (1922), set on Thursday 16 June 1904. The event will take place not on Bloomsday itself (purists be warned) but on the night before, which happens to be a Thursday, 15 June 2017, at the Irish Club in Canberra, and will feature readings from the novel, songs and Irish music, and a two-course dinner. Please find the poster here, distribute this widely and make sure to book early!

Lunchtime seminar: Mabel Cuesta on Lydia Cabrera

Lydia Cabrera: Ethnography and Forbidden Desires

Thursday 1 June, 1pm Milgate Room, AD Hope Bldg, SLLL

Lydia Cabrera (1899-1991), the most important ethnographer and folk writer in the Cuban archive, was an exile in the United States for the last thirty years of her life –previously she lived in Paris, Madrid, and Havana. In all these cities, she was able to engage well-known female artists and writers who were lesbians as herself and whose financial and emotional support allowed Cabrera to better survive in the homophobic societies she was always living in and struggling against in order to survive as a respected scholar and fiction writer despite her sexual desires. My project will argue that those lesbian and ultimately female alliances are the ones that better served and financially supported Cabrera’s intellectual ambitions.

This presentation is part of a book project that explores the significance of the emergence of these alliances by analysing the traditional mythical connection established between woman and island, as well as the identities produced by female writers who had been historically silenced in Spanish Caribbean fiction, as well as in the anthropological work mostly produced by male scholars. In this regard, I have paid close attention to the treatment of homoerotism, exile, ethnicity, patriotism and the birth of feminism as a tool to confront the male power as well as its alliances with colonial practices.

Dr Mabel Cuesta is Associate Professor of US Latino and Caribbean Literature at the University of Houston.

Invitation: Bloomsday 2017

Along with Neville Potter, a PhD graduate of SLLL, Russell Smith has been involved in organizing an event for Bloomsday, the annual celebration in honour of James Joyce’s novel Ulysses (1922), set on Thursday 16 June 1904. The event will take place not on Bloomsday itself (purists be warned) but on the night before, which happens to be a Thursday, 15 June 2017, at the Irish Club in Canberra, and will feature readings from the novel, songs and Irish music, and a two-course dinner. Please find the poster here, distribute this widely and make sure to book early!

Lunchtime seminar: Monique Rooney on the aesthetics of Rousseau’s amour de soi

Love’s Intermediary: the Aesthetics of Rousseau’s Amour de Soi (Self-Love)

Thursday 25 May, 1pm Milgate Room, AD Hope Bldg, SLLL

‘Love, like perfectibility, is structured like a figure of speech’ writes Paul de Man in a statement that resembles that of a famous psychoanalyst on the unconscious and language. If de Man’s figural ‘Love’ here echoes Lacan’s linguistic unconscious then this mimetic resonance is implied, rather than categorically referenced, in the chapter ‘Self (Pygmalion)’ (Allegories of Reading, 1979) in which de Man engages not with Lacan but with Rousseau’s dramatisation of self-love. For de Man, Rousseau’s Pygmalion (1762) amounts to more than an exploration of vanity. Instead the statue’s metamorphosis—which is structured ‘like a figure of speech’—dramatises the idea that Pygmalion’s artwork is radically other.

The first part of this paper closely engages with the highly rhetorical distinction Rousseau makes between amour propre (love based on vanity, pride or desire for esteem) and amour de soi (self-love) in explicitly philosophical (written) works in which amour de soi is speculatively associated with a pre-linguistic and pre-social moment in time. Turning to de Man’s analysis of Pygmalion, the paper then emphasises the significance of suspension as a figural or dramatic halting of time through which Rousseau’s more elusive version of self-love (amour de soi) is impossibly re-animated and from within the ‘monstrous concatenation’ or ‘mixed genre’ that is Rousseau’s lyric scene (de Man, 1979). How then, the paper asks, might Rousseau’s scene of suspension and reanimation, and its enduring legacy of melodrama, contribute to the transhistorical theorisation of intermediality in the digital age?

Monique Rooney teaches in the English Program, ANU. Her current project further pursues, and applies to an Australian aesthetic context, the ideas about intermediality explored in Living Screens: Melodrama and Plasticity in Contemporary Film and Television (2015).

Lunchtime seminar: Hadley-Williams on 17th c manuscript and its verse

Mixed pleasure: A seventeenth-century manuscript and its verse

The collection and use of vivid contemporary evidence of all kinds, so much a part of the method and works of the reformer, John Knox, were practices continued by later historians of religious history. One such gathering of documents, copied and original, is Robert Wodrow’s of the early eighteenth century, now held by the National Library of Scotland. It includes Wod.Fol.VIII, a version of David Calderwood’s History of the Kirk of Scotland, dated 1636. The manuscript also has its own interest, especially for literary scholars. Fourteen short pieces of verse, in either Latin or Scots, are inserted into the prose text. In several cases the poems are well known from their appearances in John Foxe’s Actes, the histories of Knox and Calderwood, and similar works. In Wod.Fol.VIII, however, these versions of known poems have small or more substantive differences, which help to reveal circulation patterns and the evolution in thinking about the issues they address. A few other poems in Wod.Fol.VIII are not known to occur elsewhere. These are here reported, and briefly studied. The paper will discuss the 1636 manuscript, its copyist, and the verse inclusions.

Janet Hadley Williams is Honorary Lecturer, English and Drama, in SLLL, and President of the Sir David Lyndsay Society. For the Association for Scottish Literary Studies she edited Sir David Lyndsay: Selected Poems (2000). She has edited several essay collections, including (with Priscilla Bawcutt), A Companion to Medieval Scottish Poetry (2006), and (with J. Derrick McClure), Fresche fontanis: Studies in the Culture of Medieval and Early Modern Scotland (2013). Her edition for the Scottish Text Society, ‘Duncane Laideus Testament’ and Other Comic Poems in Older Scots, appeared in 2016.

Lunchtime seminar: Rosanne Kennedy on ‘Shards of Testimony’.

Shards of Testimony: Digital Witnessing to Refugee Lives in Detention

Thursday 11 May, 1pm Milgate Room, AD Hope Bldg, SLLL

This paper explores two contemporary case studies of digital witnessing based on the experiences of refugees and asylum seekers in the Australian offshore border protection regime. First, The Messenger, a podcast from within the detention centre on Manus Island in PNG, broadcasts the voice of Aziz, a young Sudanese refugee who is now in his third year of detention. Aziz and Michael, a journalist in Melbourne, use WhatsApp to communicate. The intimate form of voice recordings enables Aziz not only to report on the daily routines and disruptions that structure life at the camp, but to convey a strong sense of himself and of life in the camp. Second, we consider the Nauru Files, incident reports written by staff at the detention centre on Nauru, leaked to The Guardian and made accessible online in an interactive digital database.

We will map these two cases as a ‘dense digital environment’ generated by an assemblage of technologies that disseminate refugee testimonial now from within a border protection regime that works to render these offshore sites invisible and silent. As Kay Schaffer and Sidonie Smith suggest, digital environments raise provocative questions about how to approach emergent acts and instances of witness. Here we will argue that distinctive assemblages of user, story, interface and device are emerging from these southern spaces, and that, as the streets and squares of Cairo are imprinted in e-witnessing from the Arab Spring, so too the mobilisation of testimony from these camps is a distinctive testimonial culture.

Rosanne Kennedy is Associate Professor of Literature and Gender, Sexuality and Culture at the Australian National University. Gillian Whitlock is Professor of Literature at University of Queensland. They are working on a project on refugee live narrative in a digital era.

Lunchtime seminar: Ash Collins on the forgotten Spinozist

The Forgotten Spinozist: Romain Rolland, Gilles Deleuze, and the Figure of Christ

To this day, the thinking of Spinoza still serves as a powerful tool for those seeking to negotiate the nexus between theological transcendence and the immanence of worldly existence. This paper explores the thought of one of the most important—and yet least remembered—Spinozists within 20th century French intellectual history: the Nobel Prize-winning French novelist, Romain Rolland (1866–1944). Past scholarship has repeatedly identified a divergence between the Catholic orthodoxy against which a youthful Rolland rebelled and the Spinozist non-conformism that shaped his thinking throughout life. By re-reading Rolland’s intellectual engagement with religion through the thinking of Gilles Deleuze, this study counters such critical interpretations and argues that the tension between Catholic orthodoxy and Spinozism cannot purely be seen in terms of a polemical conflict, but rather as the opportunity for a fruitful dialogue that has much to offer our own treatment of the religious question in the 21st century.

Ash Collins is Lecturer in French Studies at the Australian National University. His primary research interests include 20th and 21st century French intellectual history, 20th century French literature, continental philosophy, philosophy of religion, and philosophy of education. He has published his research in journals such as Australian Journal of French Studies, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, and Educational Philosophy and Theory.